ICE Powered!

Where Heads Bang

Sponsored Links

Home BLOGOSPHERE ICE Core Scientists Playing Russian Roulette

Scientists Playing Russian Roulette

PDF Print E-mail
User Rating: / 0
PoorBest 
Written by Patrick   
Thursday, 02 July 2009 19:02

This Gallup poll enlightens us on what the best of the best in American science believe (or not) about evolution.

Young-Earth Creationist = 5%

Guided Evolution = 40%

"Naturalistic" Evolution = 55%

For members of the National Academy of Sciences*, the results are:

Young-Earth Creationist = 3%

Guided Evolution = 14%

“Naturalistic” Evolution = 83%

*data from the Cornell Evolution Project

So here's how I read it.  One in six of the most accomplished living scientists believe in a living God responsible for the creation of mankind.

Pascal compares the risks of belief and disbelief:

1) If I disbelieve in God and I'm wrong, I lose everything.
2) If I disbelieve in God and I'm right, I gain nothing.
3) If I believe in God and I'm wrong, I lose nothing.
4) If I believe in God and I'm right, I gain everything.

The only rational position to take is #4 where you have everything to gain and nothing to lose.  That is Pascal's Wager.

Now if we take our odds of God being real from the greatest living scientists we find the odds of God being real are 1 in 6 (17%).  So this is essentially like playing Russian Roulette with a 6-shot revolver with five bullets in it.  If you pull the trigger and nothing happens you gain nothing but if you pull the trigger and the gun fires you lose your life.  Why play that game?  Even if the odds were a thousand or a million to one against getting a bullet in the head why play?



Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Reddit! Del.icio.us! JoomlaVote! Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! Yahoo! Free social bookmarking plugins and extensions for Joomla! websites!

Add your comment

Your name:
Subject:
Comment:
  The word for verification. Lowercase letters only with no spaces.
Word verification: