|
Written by CloudNight
|
|
Thursday, 11 June 2009 13:46 |
|
Indubitably, you've heard of the fanatical antisemite shooting at the Holocaust Museum (well, if you haven't you have now.) Well, with a extreme anti-government shooting, anti-abortionist shooting, and now our most recent Holocaust shooting, a pattern is evident with extremist rightwing shootings.
Extremist might even be to nice a word, these men that are acting with violent force to meet their means are terrorists. What type of action should be taken to minimize this risk?
Is a national gun law necessary for the sake of the public? Or should we arm the masses in able to protect ourselves more properly? I'm not completely sure if more guns is the answer, but conservatives sure seem locked on to arming the gays...
|
|
Last Updated on Thursday, 11 June 2009 16:13 |
Also, von Brunn, the suspect in today's Holocaust Memorial Museum shooting, supposedly describes the relevance of social Darwinism to his sick thinking in his "manifesto". http://loveforlife.com.au/files/tob_shebbe_goyim_harog_first6_0.pdf I have not read it myself, nor will I, but some friends of mine were discussing it in emails to me so I thought I'd pass it on.
As for gun laws, von Brunn was a convicted felon. He was not allowed to own a gun of any type and he broke existing laws by obtaining one. What we need is better enforcement of existing laws, not the creation of new laws affecting the average normal US citizen.